Off Topic: A furor in Italy

Well, Din, I don't know how we ended up talking past each other but I
think we're mostly in agreemennt on some of the issues. So
considerable snippage will follow as I veer off on a new tangent.

--- In mepbmlist@y..., Din <din_ohtar@y...> wrote:

--- Michael Martinez <michael@x...> wrote: >
> And, of course, a lot of people focus on the
> Elf-Dwarf thing as an example of racism, although it's never

explained in

> The Lord of the Rings (in fact, we can't be entirely sure it's

ever

> explained at all, although a passage in The Peoples of Middle-

earth

> may be the explanation).

It has been explain
a) the dwarves and the elven fought a large battle
against each other in the first age. The dwarves claim
the elves cheated them (and they were right). So they
raised an army and sacked an elven kingdom. The elves
then destroyed the dwarven army on the way back.

Well, this has been the stock answer for many years, but Tolkien
doesn't just come out and say so. And, in fact, with the publication
of either The Peoples of Middle-earth or The War of the Jewels, it
turns out the real problem lay farther back.

There is only one statement in the entire Lord of the Rings about any
racial problems between Elves and Dwarves. People look at all the
attention given to Legolas and Gimli and to Gandalf's comment about
grievances between Elves and Dwarves at the Council of Elrond and
they infer that there must be some real issues.

In fact, there was really only ever one issue between ALL Elves and
ALL Dwarves, and it was eseentially an issue for the Dwarves but not
for the Elves.

Keep in mind that throughout most of their history, the Elves and
Dwarves were usually allied in some capacity. Friendship between the
two races was the norm, not the exception. Close, warm friendshp was
the exception. So the close, warm friendship between Legolas and
Gimli, represented I think by the deep mutual respect they held for
one another as individuals, was especially unusual. Elves and
Dwarves could be friendly, civil, and allied without being buddy-
buddy.

So, what was the problem?

In one of the appendices to LoTR, Tolkien makes the almost off-hand
comment that the Dwarves' ancient grudge smoldered in the Third Age.
He never bothered to explain what the ancient grudge was. It is only
hinted at in The Silmarillion.

But it's explained in HOME. That is, the Dwarves resented the fact
that the Sindar used to hunt the Petty-Dwarves like animals. The
Petty-Dwarves may have been outcasts, but they were still Dwarves.
The resentment appears to have been universally held by the Dwarves.
But they realized they had to put their differences aside and work
with the Elves.

Now, there is no need to go digging for problems between Elves and
Dwarves in Doriath or Lorien. The war with Doriath was never fully
worked out by JRRT (you can pretty much ignore what was written
in "Of the Ruin of Doriath" in The Silmarillion). And although
Lorien banned Dwarves for many years, none of the Elves, not even
Celeborn, expressed any particular dislike for Dwarves. Nor did
Gimli ever express any dislike for Elves.

Occasional spats were going to happen, but there was nothing on a
racial scale, except for the resentment that Tolkien said all Dwarves
felt concerning the hunting of the Petty-Dwarves (who eventually died
out).

c) its claimed by implication that the dwarves fought
on morgoth's side in the last battle. I disagree, and
I feel some dwarves didn't fight on the elven side.

I'm not aware of any passage which states that Dwarves were accused
of fighting for Morgoth. However, in "Of the Rings of Power and the
Third Age" Tolkien wrote that, at the time of the War of the Last
Alliance, all things were divided, except the Elves. He also says
that few Dwarves fought on either side.

The passage clearly implies that some Dwarves fought for Sauron.
However, this would not be a cause for some ancient Dwarven grudge
against the Elves.

> There I quote Tolkien from Letter 131:
>
> "The chief power (of all the rings alike) was the
> prevention or slowing of decay (i.e., 'change' viewed as a
> regrettable thing), the preservation of what is desired or loved,

or its

> semblance -- this is more or less an Elvish motive.

I don't understand who gave the dwarves their rings.
They didn't share the same ideas as the elves.

Sauron took the Seven and the Nine from the Elves, returned to
Mordor, perverted them, and then contrived to give them to the
Dwarves and Men. That much is stated in "Of the Rings of Power and
the Third Age".

> So, that is straight from Tolkien himself. Like I
> said, you have to read the Letters to understand the full score

on the

> Rings of Power.

I agree with that. What's the point ?

The point of my citation? To show that all the Rings (except the
One) were Elven Rings, although they had some distinctions.

The point of my essay was to argue that the Elves had a lot to answer
for. Gildor seems to be weighted down with unexplained guilt when
Frodo talks to him in the Shire. That guilt is never explained, but
Gildor was apparently doing the responsible thing and helping set
matters right (at least as much as he could without getting further
involved).

> Yes, but had the Elves of Eregion not made the Rings
> of Power, there would have been no Rings of Power. Hence, Sauron
> would not have been the Lord of the Rings (something more than he

was as

> merely Sauron), and there would have been no wars fought over the
> Rings of Power.

sauron would still have fought.

Without the One Ring, which he would not have made if his plan had
failed. If we assume that the War of the Elves and Sauron would have
resulted over some other cause, and that Sauron would eventually have
been taken to Numenor, he might still have accomplished a lot there.
But if he HAD achieved the complete destruction of Numenor, he not
only would have gone down with it, he would not have recovered.

Sauron was able to come back from death twice because the One Ring
stored most of his strength.

So who started the talk about landing on the undying
lands ?

I pointed out that the Numenoreans' invasion of Aman was a greater
act of evil than anything committed by the Orcs.

Anyway, hopefully I've shortened this. I'm trying to shoren it. :slight_smile:

You hate the 'flames', unless you light them yourself.

That's a fine Parthian shot, loosing the last arrow over the withers as you
gallop over the crest of the hill. Fine. Though I'd love to continue a
dialogue, you don't seem to be interested in such. Step back sometime, and
look at your own intellectual arrogance and tone, before you criticize
others for taking you to task on what you've said.

···

----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Martinez <michael@xenite.org>
To: <mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 6:53 PM
Subject: [mepbmlist] Well, since G.W. Tallen wants a flame war...

I'm not going to respond to any more of his nonsense. I've found
that people who turn a discussion into a commentary on the other
person's motives will quickly crank up the heat and then blame the
other person for starting the problem.

G.W., I doubt you'll take my advice, but if you feel compelled to
attack the other person's character, that is a pretty good sign you
have nothing worth saying. Try not to reword what other people say,
and not to attribute intents and motives to them they don't possess,
and you'll make more friends.

Middle Earth PBM List - Middle Earth and Harlequin Games
To Unsubscribe:www.egroups.com
http://www.MiddleEarthGames.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Din, you're right on with several points. But see below...

> >
>
> Oh please. Ancestry, in such cultures, has much to
> do with greatness. It
> defines what choices one has. No Dunlending, nor
> Breelander, nor even
> Rohirrim, no matter how noble, brave, or
> intelligent, could have ridden the
> Paths of the Dead, or been granted command of the
> last host of the West, or
> ascended to the Kingship of Gondor.

<that's what the problem is. I suggest you look up on
the defination of racism>

Sorry, I don't get it. Call me dumb. My point is that certain
'opportunities' (as above) were available to Aragorn by virtue of his
ancestry. Not that others, even the meek and unknown, are not capable of
great deeds, but that many opportunities for 'greatness' (or what the
writers and singers will call such) only appear to those well-placed by
history and ancestry. In JRRT's world, I don't think there's any suggestion
that the Edain, upon their first encounter with the elves, were innately
superior to other men. Those distant ancestors made choices -- and as a
consequence, their descendants were positioned, if you will, to performs
deeds of greater consequence, some good, some very evil.

> You had to have
> the blood. None but
> the descendants of Elros, with the strengths and
> knowledge granted to them,
> could have contemplated an assault upon Valinor. In
> this myth, as in life,
> great men faced great choices, but when they chose
> well and you honor them
> for it, don't forget the ancestry that placed them
> there.

I assume you left out the :slight_smile:

Hardly. Societies of men in the Third Age of Middle Earth (and most
societies of men and elves in Tolkien's writings) appear on the evidence to
have been mostly organized on a feudal, or at least rigidly hierarchical and
monarchic, model. JRRT doesn't give us much of a look at the underclass
that supports such a society, but men being men, a glance at more recent
history should suffice. It's not often a pretty picture. In such a rigid
hierarchical society, there is little social mobility, and when 'great'
deeds are done, they are perforce done by those in positions of leadership.
Songs were written about Roland and Charlemagne, making them 'great' in the
eyes of posterity; but that does not mean (and I do not mean to imply) that
makes them superior in a moral sense to the commoners they ruled.

> >
> > You've missed the whole point of Tolkien's putting
> the fate of the
> > world in the hands of Hobbits if you truly believe
> he was saying
> > anyone was better than anyone else.

It wasn't the hobbits who saved the world. It was
frodo. And Frodo wasn't a normal hobbit. While tolkien
showed that the hobbits lifestyle could be considered
superior to the other races lifestyle (based on
personal happiness), it would be a boring world is
only the hobbits lived there.

Excellent point about Frodo! He was an exceptional, not a typical hobbit.
And as appealing as is seems, the hobbit 'lifestyle' was permitted only
because their Shire was guarded from the big bad world by the unsung labors
of others whose lives were less idyllic.

>
> Indeed. It always starts somewhere, and sometimes,
> even in heirachical
> societies, it starts with the humble. Without the
> hobbits this would have
> been an interesting but ultimately shallow piece of
> work.

I've read a few old sci-fi books which deal with super
weapons, massive ships, dangerous enemies, great
heros. etc. etc. These heros were not humble, and they
were great reads.

Yeah, you're right, I've enjoyed them too, but I still believe we identified
with the hobbits in this 'great and thumping' tale, and that gave it a
dimension that was unique.

> >
So what's worse - one group of people who do great
good and great evil, or another group of people who
did one great evil and lots of little evil acts.

hard call. And in the easterlings defenses, they
didn't think they were the evil ones.

Nor did the average German in the mid-1940's. That's how the heroic ages
blend into the modern: when imperfect men with free will (and imperfect
knowledge) become the main players, and evil does not always come cloaked in
black.

thanks
m

p.s am i the only one who is getting lost ? I must
stop replying since i've got other things to do than
write essays on this.

me too. but it's fun.

···

----- Original Message -----
From: Din <din_ohtar@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [mepbmlist] Re: Off Topic: A furor in Italy

>
>

____________________________________________________________________________
_

http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger
- Voice chat, mail alerts, stock quotes and favourite news and lots more!

Middle Earth PBM List - Middle Earth and Harlequin Games
To Unsubscribe:www.egroups.com
http://www.MiddleEarthGames.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/