1650 3 vs 3 Grudge

General
#1

Anyone interested in this type of game?

It’s a 1650 Grudge game with 3 players playing the Free, and 3 players playing the Dark Servants(easterlings removed). That is 4 nations a piece!

I have contacted ME Games and each person to play 4 nations would play the 4th nation for free! That’s right pay for 3 and play the 4th for free!!

This would be a 2 week game with no turn limit. Victory occurs when one side surrenders, is eliminated or a One Ring Victory is acchieved.

I have come up with the following format for how the nations are allocated:

Free Peoples
#1
Noldo Elves
Cardolan
Arthedain
Woodmen

#2
Sinda Elves
Dwarves
North Men
Dunlendings

#3
Eothraim
Northern Gondor
Southern Gondor
Corsairs

Dark Servants
#1
Witch King
Rhudaur
Ice King
Fire King

#2
Dragon Lord
Dog Lord
Cloud Lord
Quiet Avenger

#3
Long Rider
Blind Sorcerer
Dark Lieutenants
Harad

If this catches your interest please contact Clint or Rob at me@middleearthgames.com

If you have an idea or comment feel free to post them.:slight_smile:

#2

Now I have just started a grudge game had you caught me earlier I would have taken you up on this as next to the one on one this is the best option to play

Perhaps later after you get this game out of the way

#3

3 players 4 nations or 4 players 3 nations is easily the best way to run the war effectively. More players and you have to make compromises, fewer (2 or 1…) and you lose sight of much as the character #'s climb.

#4

I would be interested in this type of game but currently in too many “communication” games.

If it were GB then I would definitely be tempted.

The FP line-up makes sense but I do not agree with the logic of the DS set-up: I would suggest: WK/Rhu/DrL/CL, DoL/Dkl/IK/FK and LR/BS/QA/HA.

Mike