i'm sorry, does this mean you agree with my "Average and Standard Deviation"
idea, or, as you have so emphatically stated in the past, not?
until then, "what" exactly, would do what? either "relative to nation records
(after one is established)" would be MORE fair, or LESS fair.
i am opposed to the silly Anti Individual Winner movement. yet, i recognized
the need to rate the skills fairly, regardless of the disparity between
starting nation powers.
well. come clean, or at least honestly consistent.
better or worse. you knock the stink out of my idea (illogically, in my
"opinion"), and then seem to support it.
please.
thanks.
brad brunet
ยทยทยท
On Fri, 16 March 2001, "Winn Keathley" wrote:
rankings
relative to nation records (after one is established) is a good idea, for
fairness considerations. Until then I suspect it would only amplify the
problems in the current system.Winn
__________________________________________________________
Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com