We have liked the idea of the "most fought(won. lost, numbers engaged),
stolen, killed, influenced, etc. Also let the players vote for the MOST
Valuable to the team!! This is the only one which should get a "PRIZE!"
···
-----Original Message-----
From: Middle Earth PBM Games [SMTP:me@MiddleEarthGames.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 10:10 PM
To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [mepbmlist] Certificates
Actually, I do think certificates are a good idea, or would be if they
were done well - I think it would be pleasant to have a momento of a
well fought game. Just stop a moment to think about what we pay
Harlequin for a long game 3.90 x 40 turns = 156 UKP.
Most 1650 games last about a year. 2950 twice that. Set-up reduces it a
bit in price. We're working on this as well..
There was also a long discussion (before the Deft take-over) of a player
rating system. Basically, the suggestion was to replace placings, by a
right to vote at the end of the game for: best player, 2nd best etc. on
your own team, and on the opposition team. Tot up the points, and list
everyone's scores on the web.
I could send out a sheet at the end of the game with a points/voting system
for this if players thought it worthwhile to get another winner?
What "PRIZE" is there other than honerable mentions..
Jim Johnston wrote:
···
We have liked the idea of the "most fought(won. lost, numbers engaged),
stolen, killed, influenced, etc. Also let the players vote for the MOST
Valuable to the team!! This is the only one which should get a "PRIZE!"
-----Original Message-----
From: Middle Earth PBM Games [SMTP:me@MiddleEarthGames.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 10:10 PM
To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [mepbmlist] Certificates
> Actually, I do think certificates are a good idea, or would be if they
> were done well - I think it would be pleasant to have a momento of a
> well fought game. Just stop a moment to think about what we pay
> Harlequin for a long game 3.90 x 40 turns = 156 UKP.
Most 1650 games last about a year. 2950 twice that. Set-up reduces it a
bit in price. We're working on this as well..
> There was also a long discussion (before the Deft take-over) of a player
> rating system. Basically, the suggestion was to replace placings, by a
> right to vote at the end of the game for: best player, 2nd best etc. on
> your own team, and on the opposition team. Tot up the points, and list
> everyone's scores on the web.
>
I could send out a sheet at the end of the game with a points/voting system
for this if players thought it worthwhile to get another winner?
