Clint and Players

Yeah Yeah, I personally prefer the 1 week myself (still too slow....) and some guys are
willing to do it, but a few others still prefer the two week turnaround. You know, they're
a little old fashioned, trying to juggle a real life, and preferring to plan with telelphones
and all that.........

We've been waiting a while now, and each new scenario that comes up to a team vote
ends in the same thing: 1650 / 2 week / 1 nation per player. We're patient...when we
get our game going, it'll be a battle for the ages!

Regards,

Brad Brunet

···

On Fri, 19 January 2001, Jason Bennett wrote:

Benjamin Shushan wrote:

> Have a 12-man team who'd love to play 1650 DS ... but we _really_ prefer 1-week. With the

As part of the team, let me echo Ben's preference. Two week games are ok
for two nation setups, but for one nation, I prefer one week as well.
Cone on, you Canadians get the same cheap phone calls! :slight_smile:

        jason

--
Jason Bennett, jasonab@acm.org
Software developer, cryptography buff, gamer
Believer in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord

Middle Earth PBM List - Middle Earth and Harlequin Games
To Unsubscribe:www.egroups.com
http://www.MiddleEarthGames.com

__________________________________________________________
Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com