Brad: Then why didn't he appeal for a higher voter turn out? Ed
···
From: "Brad Brunet" <bbrunec296@rogers.com>
Reply-To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
To: <mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [mepbmlist] Council of the Wise
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:59:02 -0500----- Original Message -----
From: "Ovatha Easterling" <ovatha88@hotmail.com>
To: <mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [mepbmlist] Council of the Wise> As I recall Clint's posting, he was not objecting to light voter turnout
but
> was wanting to disqualify some of the votes received because they were
> voting for "non-candidates".
> Ed Mills..... "non-cadidates" because they didn't vote...which is likely a majority
of the players, thus there's a reasonable chance that most votes are spoiled
because most aren't voting and thus can't be voted for...I think this means he was most certainly objecting to light voter turnout.
Brad Brunet
_________________________________________________________________
Cell phone �switch� rules are taking effect � find out more here. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/consumeradvocate.armx