February 2004 FtF.

Hi Charles,

       Hi, Brad.

I noticed you posted as far back as July. You've also stated that you are
not yet even a customer of this company, but have been lurking on the egroup
undecided if you were going to get back into it (previous player, yes?).

       I'll have to take your word for that, Brad, but that may be right. I
thought that I had posted previously that I had played Middle-earth PBM when it
was run by GSI, but that was a number of years ago, but not since
Middle-earth Games had started running it.
       As far as what you term "lurking," I suppose that would be both "yes"
and "no." I have followed some of the posts, but not all of them.

ell, if you've been following since July at least, you've read this policy
a few times. When there's five guys over a card table, maybe you don't wear
name tags...

       Well, I'm not sure if I have or not, but it would hold more relevance
to me of late, due to the recent, the last day or so, discussions regarding
customer service issues, which I believe followed a complaint by someone on a
team of Australian players.
       As far as guys playing cards and wearing name tags, I suppose that
depends on the five guys. At times, at various events or occasions, people do
wear name tags when playing games.

This is a public forum supported by the company. They listen, they
contribute, they ask questions, they answer queries. Simple coutesy is all
they ask.

       Well, actually, I believe the choice of words was policy. Not all
topics that I have seen discussed, of the messages I have read, have appealed to
me, or I have had an opinion on. Some of the recent topics, though not all of
them, I have found more interesting, or more relevant, as such issues are
important to me. That sort of thing, though, varies widely from individual to
individual, so it doesn't surprise me that some find certain things more
interesting than others.

  I've got a list of various customer service "gold-stars" MEGames

has earned, if you care.

       Sure, by all means, enlighten me. Of course, there's always room for
improvement, isn't there?

One of Clint's customer service sins may involve

caring enough about the game and it's players such that he often leaves the
"corporate P-C" script behind and comes out with personable off the cuff
responses to much of what's written here. An example of eagerness was his
reply to an "anonymous" query, waylaying his own oft-stated policy in order
to participate in a discussion. It may have been a PR faux-pas to come out
and lay down the rules after he had broken them himself...but he's a human
who obviously has a keen interest in the game and it's players, so forgive
him the slap to the forehead quick-send and appreciate the impetus behind
the rule.

       Well, don't misunderstand, I don't have anything personal against him.
I don't really know him. I merely responded to what was posted.
       

And no, I'm neither a neighbour nor friend of Clint or anyone else at the
company, and have had my share of personality clashes with some of them, so
I'm not sucking up for free turns, pizza, or a ride to the station in the
morning.

       Well, Brad, I don't have any reason to believe that you are. I've
never played a game run by Middle-earth Games, so I naturally don't have
experience, one way or the other, to draw upon. However, as I mentioned previously, I
did play Middle-earth PBM when it was run by GSI. in case I didn't mention it
before, I will now, and that is that, speaking for me personally and only, I
never experienced any bad service from GSI, when it ran the game. Of the
interactions I did have with the GSI staff, they were always helpful and coureous.
Others, of course, may had other experiences with GSI, but that was my personal
experience in gaming with them.

  Appreciate the nature of their involvement with their customers as

something greater than most any other commercial enterprise could envision.
If "customer service" is what's holding you back from even being a customer
at all for these months, than please enlighten us with tales of bigger,
bolder, brighter, and better gaming groups.

Regards,

t

       Well, actually, no, that isn't what's "holding me back," as you put
it, Brad. Perhaps I hadn't mentioned it in one of my previous posts, but I have
been hoping to get into a game with some other people I know from some other
games. Several have, in fact, expressed an interest, but a couple of those that
did also conveyed unto me that they would like to wait until one of their
current other games (Hyborian War games) ends.
       As far as other gaming groups, I suppose everyone has their own idea
of what constitutes bigger, bolder, brighter, or better, where games are
concerned. I don't limit myself solely to PBM games, nor even PBEM games. I always
felt that Middle-earth PBM was one of the better designed games, as far as the
PBM games I have tried over time. But, there have been a number of PBM games
that I have enjoyed playing over time, run by different companies and different
moderators. It is a lot like comparing apples and oranges, though. each game
tends to have its own good points and bad points. I never tried to limit
myself to just one genre of PBM games, so what's bigger, better, bolder, or
brighter really just depends on whether we are discussing apples, oranges, bananas,
or something else.
       But, again, as I mentioned previously, I recently quit playing
Hyborian War. I didn't quit playing it because I disliked the game, though. It was
the failings in the areas of customer service that finally caused me to say,
enough is enough. That happened within only the last few weeks, Brad. I was
already considering playing Middle-earth PBM again before that ever came about.
But, since it has happened, customer service related issues are very, very much
fresh in my mind.
       I didn't initiate the recent discussion regarding customer service. I
responded, in what you term a public forum, one I had joined, as you say,
about 5 months back, to the criticism that was posted. Others seem willing and
free to post their opinions on matters that interest them. I have merely done the
same.
       There are a number of reasons, for example, that I disagree with a
policy to not respond to an e-mail in this forum, unless someone signs their name
to it. In the first instance, I fail to understand the necessity for it. If
it isn't necessary, then why make things more difficult for either the customer
or the potential customer than is necessary? In the second instance, it isn't
reliable, insofar as a person could just make a name up, anyway, a handle, an
alias, as is often the case on the Internet. Why people create aliases, of
course, varies widely from individual to individual. In the third instance, not
everyone who might have an interest in playing, or in something they want to
comment on, is necessarily an adult. Some kids or even young adults are, in
fact, admonished to not give out their name, even and including their first name.
The reasons for this are several. In the fourth instance, not all adults feel
comfortable giving out their names, and again, for a variety of reasons.
However, from my past experience in playing both PBM games in general, and in
playing Middle-earth PBM specifically, I certainly have never found anything about
either the game or the Tolkien books which serves as the underlying theme for
the game, to be detrimental to children. In the fifth instance, when I
interact with numerous other business, and have a question or want to make a
comment, my name isn't required. What distinguishes this business as extraordinarily
unique, in that regard? Nothing, as far as I have yet been able to discern. If
someone just wants to cause trouble, they can usually find a way to do that,
anyway. Looking at it from a customer-business interaction standpoint, I find
it to be both bad form and deficient practice, from a policy standpoint. That
someone doesn't want to gie their name out, just to get answers to questions,
I simply do not find to be unreasonable in the least. Companies routinely,
every single day, respond to questions, comments, and even criticisms from
individuals they don't know the name to. Polls and surveys are yet additional
examples of how anonymous input and comments are provided from customers or
potential customers to companies.

Thus far, I certainly haven't seen anyone explain why Middle-earth PBM NEEDS
a person's name, in order to either answer a question or respond to a comment.
If they don't NEED it, then to mandate it, via policy, again, to me, makes no
real sense.

Others are entitled to their opinions, of course, but that's mine.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

AND to get the discussion back on track:

Yes, I'll be attending the FtF (again ! - it's like a drug). Let's
find a date quickly so that us from abroad can get everything
coordinated - the sooner you book flight-tickets, the cheaper it
gets..
Sure hope to see a lot of familiar faces at the event, and a lot of
new faces too. If you haven't tried one of these events before: SIGN
UP !!

Ulrik

Hi Charles,

       Hi, Brad.

> I noticed you posted as far back as July. You've also stated

that you are

> not yet even a customer of this company, but have been lurking on

the egroup

> undecided if you were going to get back into it (previous player,

yes?).

>

       I'll have to take your word for that, Brad, but that may be

right. I

thought that I had posted previously that I had played Middle-earth

PBM when it

was run by GSI, but that was a number of years ago, but not since
Middle-earth Games had started running it.
       As far as what you term "lurking," I suppose that would be

both "yes"

and "no." I have followed some of the posts, but not all of them.

> ell, if you've been following since July at least, you've read

this policy

> a few times. When there's five guys over a card table, maybe you

don't wear

> name tags...
>

       Well, I'm not sure if I have or not, but it would hold more

relevance

to me of late, due to the recent, the last day or so, discussions

regarding

customer service issues, which I believe followed a complaint by

someone on a

team of Australian players.
       As far as guys playing cards and wearing name tags, I

suppose that

depends on the five guys. At times, at various events or occasions,

people do

wear name tags when playing games.

> This is a public forum supported by the company. They listen,

they

> contribute, they ask questions, they answer queries. Simple

coutesy is all

> they ask.

       Well, actually, I believe the choice of words was policy.

Not all

topics that I have seen discussed, of the messages I have read,

have appealed to

me, or I have had an opinion on. Some of the recent topics, though

not all of

them, I have found more interesting, or more relevant, as such

issues are

important to me. That sort of thing, though, varies widely from

individual to

individual, so it doesn't surprise me that some find certain things

more

interesting than others.

  I've got a list of various customer service "gold-stars" MEGames

> has earned, if you care.

       Sure, by all means, enlighten me. Of course, there's always

room for

improvement, isn't there?

One of Clint's customer service sins may involve

> caring enough about the game and it's players such that he often

leaves the

> "corporate P-C" script behind and comes out with personable off

the cuff

> responses to much of what's written here. An example of

eagerness was his

> reply to an "anonymous" query, waylaying his own oft-stated

policy in order

> to participate in a discussion. It may have been a PR faux-pas

to come out

> and lay down the rules after he had broken them himself...but

he's a human

> who obviously has a keen interest in the game and it's players,

so forgive

> him the slap to the forehead quick-send and appreciate the

impetus behind

> the rule.
>

       Well, don't misunderstand, I don't have anything personal

against him.

I don't really know him. I merely responded to what was posted.
       
> And no, I'm neither a neighbour nor friend of Clint or anyone

else at the

> company, and have had my share of personality clashes with some

of them, so

> I'm not sucking up for free turns, pizza, or a ride to the

station in the

> morning.

       Well, Brad, I don't have any reason to believe that you are.

I've

never played a game run by Middle-earth Games, so I naturally don't

have

experience, one way or the other, to draw upon. However, as I

mentioned previously, I

did play Middle-earth PBM when it was run by GSI. in case I didn't

mention it

before, I will now, and that is that, speaking for me personally

and only, I

never experienced any bad service from GSI, when it ran the game.

Of the

interactions I did have with the GSI staff, they were always

helpful and coureous.

Others, of course, may had other experiences with GSI, but that was

my personal

experience in gaming with them.

  Appreciate the nature of their involvement with their customers as

> something greater than most any other commercial enterprise could

envision.

> If "customer service" is what's holding you back from even being

a customer

> at all for these months, than please enlighten us with tales of

bigger,

> bolder, brighter, and better gaming groups.
>
> Regards,
>
> t

       Well, actually, no, that isn't what's "holding me back," as

you put

it, Brad. Perhaps I hadn't mentioned it in one of my previous

posts, but I have

been hoping to get into a game with some other people I know from

some other

games. Several have, in fact, expressed an interest, but a couple

of those that

did also conveyed unto me that they would like to wait until one of

their

current other games (Hyborian War games) ends.
       As far as other gaming groups, I suppose everyone has their

own idea

of what constitutes bigger, bolder, brighter, or better, where

games are

concerned. I don't limit myself solely to PBM games, nor even PBEM

games. I always

felt that Middle-earth PBM was one of the better designed games, as

far as the

PBM games I have tried over time. But, there have been a number of

PBM games

that I have enjoyed playing over time, run by different companies

and different

moderators. It is a lot like comparing apples and oranges, though.

each game

tends to have its own good points and bad points. I never tried to

limit

myself to just one genre of PBM games, so what's bigger, better,

bolder, or

brighter really just depends on whether we are discussing apples,

oranges, bananas,

or something else.
       But, again, as I mentioned previously, I recently quit

playing

Hyborian War. I didn't quit playing it because I disliked the game,

though. It was

the failings in the areas of customer service that finally caused

me to say,

enough is enough. That happened within only the last few weeks,

Brad. I was

already considering playing Middle-earth PBM again before that ever

came about.

But, since it has happened, customer service related issues are

very, very much

fresh in my mind.
       I didn't initiate the recent discussion regarding customer

service. I

responded, in what you term a public forum, one I had joined, as

you say,

about 5 months back, to the criticism that was posted. Others seem

willing and

free to post their opinions on matters that interest them. I have

merely done the

same.
       There are a number of reasons, for example, that I disagree

with a

policy to not respond to an e-mail in this forum, unless someone

signs their name

to it. In the first instance, I fail to understand the necessity

for it. If

it isn't necessary, then why make things more difficult for either

the customer

or the potential customer than is necessary? In the second

instance, it isn't

reliable, insofar as a person could just make a name up, anyway, a

handle, an

alias, as is often the case on the Internet. Why people create

aliases, of

course, varies widely from individual to individual. In the third

instance, not

everyone who might have an interest in playing, or in something

they want to

comment on, is necessarily an adult. Some kids or even young adults

are, in

fact, admonished to not give out their name, even and including

their first name.

The reasons for this are several. In the fourth instance, not all

adults feel

comfortable giving out their names, and again, for a variety of

reasons.

However, from my past experience in playing both PBM games in

general, and in

playing Middle-earth PBM specifically, I certainly have never found

anything about

either the game or the Tolkien books which serves as the underlying

theme for

the game, to be detrimental to children. In the fifth instance,

when I

interact with numerous other business, and have a question or want

to make a

comment, my name isn't required. What distinguishes this business

as extraordinarily

unique, in that regard? Nothing, as far as I have yet been able to

discern. If

someone just wants to cause trouble, they can usually find a way to

do that,

anyway. Looking at it from a customer-business interaction

standpoint, I find

it to be both bad form and deficient practice, from a policy

standpoint. That

someone doesn't want to gie their name out, just to get answers to

questions,

I simply do not find to be unreasonable in the least. Companies

routinely,

every single day, respond to questions, comments, and even

criticisms from

individuals they don't know the name to. Polls and surveys are yet

additional

examples of how anonymous input and comments are provided from

customers or

potential customers to companies.

Thus far, I certainly haven't seen anyone explain why Middle-earth

PBM NEEDS

a person's name, in order to either answer a question or respond to

a comment.

If they don't NEED it, then to mandate it, via policy, again, to

me, makes no

···

--- In mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com, hoarofhell@w... wrote:

real sense.

Others are entitled to their opinions, of course, but that's mine.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi,

Yes, I'll be attending the FtF (again ! - it's like a drug).

See you there then Ulrik - I need my fix too :slight_smile:

Sure hope to see a lot of familiar faces at the event, and a lot of
new faces too. If you haven't tried one of these events before: SIGN
UP !!

I'll second that. Past games have sometimes had a tendancy to fall
into a pattern with the same players involved - new faces add fresh
ideas and interest into the mix.

Maybe Ovatha Easterlings could come along and not tell anyone his
name? :wink:

Colin

<<Thus far, I certainly haven't seen anyone explain why Middle-earth PBM
NEEDS
a person's name, in order to either answer a question or respond to a
comment.
If they don't NEED it, then to mandate it, via policy, again, to me, makes
no
real sense.>>

** I don't know if this is actually a reason behind Clint's name policy but
it seems to cut back on the number of "trolls" posting "flames". Yes,
trolls could make up a name, but most are apparently not that creative.
When some "nameless" person posts ridiculous remarks that are obviously
intended to arouse anger, I appreciate Clint's policy of not carrying on
banter with them. Not to say, of course, that your remarks were under this
category. However, if a "policy" is a "policy", it should be "across the
board".

Also note, Clint's note did say this was HIS policy, not MEGames'. I also
think it was perfectly polite. It even had a smiley face. :wink:

Also, like Brad, I'm not a friend/relative/anything of anyone at MEGames'.
I live across the sea from them and in fact have no friends on this side of
it either!

Russ

···

----- Original Message -----
From: <hoarofhell@wmconnect.com>
To: <mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: [mepbmlist] February 2004 FtF.

Hi Charles,

       Hi, Brad.

> I noticed you posted as far back as July. You've also stated that you

are

> not yet even a customer of this company, but have been lurking on the

egroup

> undecided if you were going to get back into it (previous player, yes?).
>

       I'll have to take your word for that, Brad, but that may be right.

I

thought that I had posted previously that I had played Middle-earth PBM

when it

was run by GSI, but that was a number of years ago, but not since
Middle-earth Games had started running it.
       As far as what you term "lurking," I suppose that would be both

"yes"

and "no." I have followed some of the posts, but not all of them.

> ell, if you've been following since July at least, you've read this

policy

> a few times. When there's five guys over a card table, maybe you don't

wear

> name tags...
>

       Well, I'm not sure if I have or not, but it would hold more

relevance

to me of late, due to the recent, the last day or so, discussions

regarding

customer service issues, which I believe followed a complaint by someone

on a

team of Australian players.
       As far as guys playing cards and wearing name tags, I suppose that
depends on the five guys. At times, at various events or occasions, people

do

wear name tags when playing games.

> This is a public forum supported by the company. They listen, they
> contribute, they ask questions, they answer queries. Simple coutesy is

all

> they ask.

       Well, actually, I believe the choice of words was policy. Not all
topics that I have seen discussed, of the messages I have read, have

appealed to

me, or I have had an opinion on. Some of the recent topics, though not all

of

them, I have found more interesting, or more relevant, as such issues are
important to me. That sort of thing, though, varies widely from individual

to

individual, so it doesn't surprise me that some find certain things more
interesting than others.

  I've got a list of various customer service "gold-stars" MEGames

> has earned, if you care.

       Sure, by all means, enlighten me. Of course, there's always room

for

improvement, isn't there?

One of Clint's customer service sins may involve

> caring enough about the game and it's players such that he often leaves

the

> "corporate P-C" script behind and comes out with personable off the cuff
> responses to much of what's written here. An example of eagerness was

his

> reply to an "anonymous" query, waylaying his own oft-stated policy in

order

> to participate in a discussion. It may have been a PR faux-pas to come

out

> and lay down the rules after he had broken them himself...but he's a

human

> who obviously has a keen interest in the game and it's players, so

forgive

> him the slap to the forehead quick-send and appreciate the impetus

behind

> the rule.
>

       Well, don't misunderstand, I don't have anything personal against

him.

I don't really know him. I merely responded to what was posted.

> And no, I'm neither a neighbour nor friend of Clint or anyone else at

the

> company, and have had my share of personality clashes with some of them,

so

> I'm not sucking up for free turns, pizza, or a ride to the station in

the

> morning.

       Well, Brad, I don't have any reason to believe that you are. I've
never played a game run by Middle-earth Games, so I naturally don't have
experience, one way or the other, to draw upon. However, as I mentioned

previously, I

did play Middle-earth PBM when it was run by GSI. in case I didn't mention

it

before, I will now, and that is that, speaking for me personally and only,

I

never experienced any bad service from GSI, when it ran the game. Of the
interactions I did have with the GSI staff, they were always helpful and

coureous.

Others, of course, may had other experiences with GSI, but that was my

personal

experience in gaming with them.

  Appreciate the nature of their involvement with their customers as

> something greater than most any other commercial enterprise could

envision.

> If "customer service" is what's holding you back from even being a

customer

> at all for these months, than please enlighten us with tales of bigger,
> bolder, brighter, and better gaming groups.
>
> Regards,
>
> t

       Well, actually, no, that isn't what's "holding me back," as you put
it, Brad. Perhaps I hadn't mentioned it in one of my previous posts, but I

have

been hoping to get into a game with some other people I know from some

other

games. Several have, in fact, expressed an interest, but a couple of those

that

did also conveyed unto me that they would like to wait until one of their
current other games (Hyborian War games) ends.
       As far as other gaming groups, I suppose everyone has their own

idea

of what constitutes bigger, bolder, brighter, or better, where games are
concerned. I don't limit myself solely to PBM games, nor even PBEM games.

I always

felt that Middle-earth PBM was one of the better designed games, as far as

the

PBM games I have tried over time. But, there have been a number of PBM

games

that I have enjoyed playing over time, run by different companies and

different

moderators. It is a lot like comparing apples and oranges, though. each

game

tends to have its own good points and bad points. I never tried to limit
myself to just one genre of PBM games, so what's bigger, better, bolder,

or

brighter really just depends on whether we are discussing apples, oranges,

bananas,

or something else.
       But, again, as I mentioned previously, I recently quit playing
Hyborian War. I didn't quit playing it because I disliked the game,

though. It was

the failings in the areas of customer service that finally caused me to

say,

enough is enough. That happened within only the last few weeks, Brad. I

was

already considering playing Middle-earth PBM again before that ever came

about.

But, since it has happened, customer service related issues are very, very

much

fresh in my mind.
       I didn't initiate the recent discussion regarding customer service.

I

responded, in what you term a public forum, one I had joined, as you say,
about 5 months back, to the criticism that was posted. Others seem willing

and

free to post their opinions on matters that interest them. I have merely

done the

same.
       There are a number of reasons, for example, that I disagree with a
policy to not respond to an e-mail in this forum, unless someone signs

their name

to it. In the first instance, I fail to understand the necessity for it.

If

it isn't necessary, then why make things more difficult for either the

customer

or the potential customer than is necessary? In the second instance, it

isn't

reliable, insofar as a person could just make a name up, anyway, a handle,

an

alias, as is often the case on the Internet. Why people create aliases, of
course, varies widely from individual to individual. In the third

instance, not

everyone who might have an interest in playing, or in something they want

to

comment on, is necessarily an adult. Some kids or even young adults are,

in

fact, admonished to not give out their name, even and including their

first name.

The reasons for this are several. In the fourth instance, not all adults

feel

comfortable giving out their names, and again, for a variety of reasons.
However, from my past experience in playing both PBM games in general, and

in

playing Middle-earth PBM specifically, I certainly have never found

anything about

either the game or the Tolkien books which serves as the underlying theme

for

the game, to be detrimental to children. In the fifth instance, when I
interact with numerous other business, and have a question or want to make

a

comment, my name isn't required. What distinguishes this business as

extraordinarily

unique, in that regard? Nothing, as far as I have yet been able to

discern. If

someone just wants to cause trouble, they can usually find a way to do

that,

anyway. Looking at it from a customer-business interaction standpoint, I

find

it to be both bad form and deficient practice, from a policy standpoint.

That

someone doesn't want to gie their name out, just to get answers to

questions,

I simply do not find to be unreasonable in the least. Companies routinely,
every single day, respond to questions, comments, and even criticisms from
individuals they don't know the name to. Polls and surveys are yet

additional

examples of how anonymous input and comments are provided from customers

or

potential customers to companies.

Thus far, I certainly haven't seen anyone explain why Middle-earth PBM

NEEDS

a person's name, in order to either answer a question or respond to a

comment.

If they don't NEED it, then to mandate it, via policy, again, to me, makes

no

real sense.

Others are entitled to their opinions, of course, but that's mine.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Middle Earth PBM - hit reply to send to everyone
To Unsubscribe: http://www.yahoogroups.com
Website: http://www.MiddleEarthGames.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Ah but last time I broke the sacred circle and the Bristol lads played against each other... :slight_smile: Next to break Chris and Colin apart and we're all set... :slight_smile:

Note FTF - either you love it or you like you it... :slight_smile:

Clint

···

Hi,

> Yes, I'll be attending the FtF (again ! - it's like a drug).

See you there then Ulrik - I need my fix too :slight_smile:

> Sure hope to see a lot of familiar faces at the event, and a lot of
> new faces too. If you haven't tried one of these events before: SIGN
> UP !!

I'll second that. Past games have sometimes had a tendancy to fall
into a pattern with the same players involved - new faces add fresh
ideas and interest into the mix.

Maybe Ovatha Easterlings could come along and not tell anyone his
name? :wink:

Colin

Middle Earth PBM - hit reply to send to everyone
To Unsubscribe: http://www.yahoogroups.com
Website: http://www.MiddleEarthGames.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

****************************************************************
                    ME Games Ltd
Mailto: me@middleearthgames.com
Website: www.middleearthgames.com

UK: 340 North Road, Cardiff CF14 3BP UK
US: EpicMail, 12330 Perry Highway, 2nd Floor, Wexford, PA15090

Phone Times: 10am-6.30pm UK Time (BST);5am-1.30 (EST)
UK: 029 2091 3359 (029 2062 5665 can be used if main is engaged)
(Dial 011 44 2920 913359 if in the US)
UK Fax: 029 2062 5532 24 hours
US Fax: 1-503-296-2325 (preferred)
US Phone: 724 933 3132 EST Weekdays
US alternate Fax: 801 650 8073 Fax 24hrs
****************************************************************