As I understand it this list serves two main functions. One is to allow
players to discuss game relevant info amongst themselves, the second is to
allow ME Games and their player base to discuss game and administration
matters. Clint & Co actively canvass player opinion about company policy on
this forum along as it does not involve personal slanging matches.
Seems to me that 'Mr Corsair 101' is doing just what they have asked. OK the
first salvo was intemperate with some, I believe, unfair accusations as to
Clint's motives but do they want to know how people actually feel or not. As
they thank people for their opinions (even is they foolishly ignore mine
;( ) I assume they are getting what they want. Since then he has put forward
relevant and rational points whether you agree with them or not.
As for anonymity, unless someone is making personal attacks, what's the
problem? How does somebodies identity affect the strength of their
arguement?
So 'Mr Corsair 101' keep on posting I(unless it is something I don't like,
off course).
Chris Courtiour
As
they thank people for their opinions (even is they foolishly ignore mine
;( ) I assume they are getting what they want. Since then he has put forward
relevant and rational points whether you agree with them or not.
*** I was not aware that I had ignored your opinion. I have not responded to that's all. I have taken your points on board as I have in many instances. I await your reply on the Curses items that we were discussing for example... 
Clint
Hi Clint,
I was referring to my opinions on differential pricing. Obviously the
stupefying force of my arguements about other matters has compelled
you to take note of them but some curious sub conscious reaction to
all your high ethics is presumably causing you to resort to this
fiendish capitalist ploy.
As for the curses discussion, those wise and enlightened fellows at
GSI have altered the terms of the arguement by altering the artifact
encounter procedure, slowing down the acquisition of curses thereby
lessening it's impact. Does give the DS another slight advantage
though.
Cheers
Chris
--- In mepbmlist@y..., Middle Earth PBM Games <me@M...> wrote:
>
>As
>they thank people for their opinions (even is they foolishly
ignore mine
>;( ) I assume they are getting what they want. Since then he has
put forward
>relevant and rational points whether you agree with them or not.
*** I was not aware that I had ignored your opinion. I have not
responded
to that's all. I have taken your points on board as I have in many
instances. I await your reply on the Curses items that we were
discussing
···
for example...
Clint
Hi Clint,
I was referring to my opinions on differential pricing. Obviously the
stupefying force of my arguements about other matters has compelled
you to take note of them but some curious sub conscious reaction to
all your high ethics is presumably causing you to resort to this
fiendish capitalist ploy.
As for the curses discussion, those wise and enlightened fellows at
GSI have altered the terms of the arguement by altering the artifact
encounter procedure, slowing down the acquisition of curses thereby
lessening it's impact. Does give the DS another slight advantage
though.
Cheers
Chris
--- In mepbmlist@y..., Middle Earth PBM Games <me@M...> wrote:
>
>As
>they thank people for their opinions (even is they foolishly
ignore mine
>;( ) I assume they are getting what they want. Since then he has
put forward
>relevant and rational points whether you agree with them or not.
*** I was not aware that I had ignored your opinion. I have not
responded
to that's all. I have taken your points on board as I have in many
instances. I await your reply on the Curses items that we were
discussing
···
for example...
Clint
