Both the Corsairs and Khand were still neutral by the way. I would also
like to mention despite an agreement being reached with the Free side so
that I would not influence their turn and released their hostages that they
would not do anything to me. I was bitterly disapointed to find my Village
burned to the ground, Ovatha assassinated and over 10,000 gold stolen.
Although to be completely honest I wasn't surprised.
Thomas
···
With the ending of 2950 g28 (the ds conceded on t21
after the last neutral turned free), I would like to
thank the following
a) the free side (especially those who were playing
their first middle earth game, and those who helped
them out).
b) the DS side (the rangers were laughing when we
threatened away Mt Gram, but Mordor was tough). For
10,000 timber a pop, you would think the bridge would
have eventually stayed up.
c) Yahoo (they helped up swap turnsheets and emails).
Noldor/South Gondor/Khand were the top three. But we
didn't lose a single free, so that's pretty good.
thanks
din
p.s. I really think leaving Mt Gram alone was a bad idea.
I guess you shouldn't have told the DS that you were going to ignore
the deal with the us - because they told us what you planned, and that
kinda meant the deal was off.
No real backstabbing here.
42!
--- In mepbmlist@y..., "Grrrr!!!! Snr." <grrrr!!!!@s...> wrote:
Both the Corsairs and Khand were still neutral by the way. I
would also
like to mention despite an agreement being reached with the Free side so
that I would not influence their turn and released their hostages
that they
would not do anything to me. I was bitterly disapointed to find my
Village
···
burned to the ground, Ovatha assassinated and over 10,000 gold stolen.
Although to be completely honest I wasn't surprised.
Thomas
>With the ending of 2950 g28 (the ds conceded on t21
>after the last neutral turned free), I would like to
>thank the following
>
>a) the free side (especially those who were playing
>their first middle earth game, and those who helped
>them out).
>b) the DS side (the rangers were laughing when we
>threatened away Mt Gram, but Mordor was tough). For
>10,000 timber a pop, you would think the bridge would
>have eventually stayed up.
>c) Yahoo (they helped up swap turnsheets and emails).
>
>Noldor/South Gondor/Khand were the top three. But we
>didn't lose a single free, so that's pretty good.
>
>thanks
>din
>
>p.s. I really think leaving Mt Gram alone was a bad idea.
Khand was still neutral? Then how did you finish third in the VP
stakes? I am sure that I speak for all my fellow Free players if your
MEPBM sensibilities have been offended in some way then we are
awfully sorry, but how do you expect us to treat a neutral that sits
on their ass for most of the game and then expects us to welcome him
into the fold with open arms just as the game is ending just so he
can claim a high VP position?
Its play like this that gives neutral players a bad name.
Brendan
South Gondor Game28
--- In mepbmlist@y..., "42!" <berget@v...> wrote:
I guess you shouldn't have told the DS that you were going to ignore
the deal with the us - because they told us what you planned, and
that
kinda meant the deal was off.
No real backstabbing here.
42!
--- In mepbmlist@y..., "Grrrr!!!! Snr." <grrrr!!!!@s...> wrote:
> Both the Corsairs and Khand were still neutral by the way. I
would also
> like to mention despite an agreement being reached with the Free
side so
> that I would not influence their turn and released their hostages
that they
> would not do anything to me. I was bitterly disapointed to find my
Village
> burned to the ground, Ovatha assassinated and over 10,000 gold
stolen.
···
> Although to be completely honest I wasn't surprised.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> >With the ending of 2950 g28 (the ds conceded on t21
> >after the last neutral turned free), I would like to
> >thank the following
> >
> >a) the free side (especially those who were playing
> >their first middle earth game, and those who helped
> >them out).
> >b) the DS side (the rangers were laughing when we
> >threatened away Mt Gram, but Mordor was tough). For
> >10,000 timber a pop, you would think the bridge would
> >have eventually stayed up.
> >c) Yahoo (they helped up swap turnsheets and emails).
> >
> >Noldor/South Gondor/Khand were the top three. But we
> >didn't lose a single free, so that's pretty good.
> >
> >thanks
> >din
> >
> >p.s. I really think leaving Mt Gram alone was a bad idea.
--- BRENMILLER@aol.com wrote: > Khand was still
neutral? Then how did you finish
third in the VP
stakes?
I looked at that as well. The last turn says 'top 3
positions'. So we could have see a DS here. Its the
earlier turns that says 'top 3 free nations' that has
mislead us.
Here I was thinking I was the only one who was
confused by the khand.
din
···
_____________________________________________________________________________ http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger
- Voice chat, mail alerts, stock quotes and favourite news and lots more!
Is there another character (even an enemy one) with the encounter at that
location now? I know you can react if someone else currently has the
encounter, but I've never tried just reacting when the encounter wasn't
currently active on someone's turn somewhere in the game.
No, my charater is the only one there at the moment. Nobody else has
done any kind of investigation on this hex recently (apart from when I
visited it several turns ago).
Draugnar wrote:
···
Is there another character (even an enemy one) with the encounter at that
location now? I know you can react if someone else currently has the
encounter, but I've never tried just reacting when the encounter wasn't
currently active on someone's turn somewhere in the game.
If you know the answer, you can just give a 285 with the answer right off.
Tony Z
···
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:22:28PM +0100, Duncan wrote:
I've just arrived at an encounter location. So far I've only found
the entrance to a dark cave and haven't done a 290 InvEnc yet.
Now I know that this is a riddle encounter and I know the correct answer
(someone came here before).
My question is this. Can I simply do a 285 ReacEnc order with the riddle
answer or do I have to do the 290 InvEnc first ?
--
"The King with half the East at heel is marched from lands of morning;
His fighters drink the rivers up, their shafts benight the air,
And he that stays will die for naught, and home there's no returning."
The Spartans on the sea-wet rock sat down and combed their hair.--A.E. Housman
Unless you are worried about challenges, why not do both? If the React
doesn't work, then the investigate will have you set to react next turn. If
the react does work, then the investigate will say there is nothing to
investigate. This way, you may get it this turn, but you'll definitely get
it next turn. If you just do the react and it doesn't work, then you have
to hang around three turns to get it.
No, my charater is the only one there at the moment. Nobody else has
done any kind of investigation on this hex recently (apart from when I
visited it several turns ago).
Draugnar wrote:
Is there another character (even an enemy one) with the encounter at that
location now? I know you can react if someone else currently has the
encounter, but I've never tried just reacting when the encounter wasn't
currently active on someone's turn somewhere in the game.
Duncan <duncan.harris@ucl.ac.uk> wrote
> I've just arrived at an encounter location. So far I've only found
>the entrance to a dark cave and haven't done a 290 InvEnc yet.
>
>Now I know that this is a riddle encounter and I know the correct answer
>(someone came here before).
>
>My question is this. Can I simply do a 285 ReacEnc order with the riddle
>answer
>or do I have to do the 290 InvEnc first ?
InvEnc first, or the encounter does not become active.
If he knows the riddle why waste an order by hearing it again? It will only
make life dangerous ,there are nasty people, out there, that move agents
according to rumors and having fun killing cjharacters while they are
admiring their new toy. And yes you can answer the riddle without having the
encounter this turn (been there done and that).
Unless you are worried about challenges, why not do both? If the React
doesn't work, then the investigate will have you set to react
next turn. If
the react does work, then the investigate will say there is nothing to
investigate. This way, you may get it this turn, but you'll
definitely get
it next turn. If you just do the react and it doesn't work, then you have
to hang around three turns to get it.
No, my charater is the only one there at the moment. Nobody else has
done any kind of investigation on this hex recently (apart from when I
visited it several turns ago).
Draugnar wrote:
>
> Is there another character (even an enemy one) with the
encounter at that
> location now? I know you can react if someone else currently has the
> encounter, but I've never tried just reacting when the encounter wasn't
> currently active on someone's turn somewhere in the game.
>
> -Rob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: duncan@ucl.ac.uk [mailto:duncan@ucl.ac.uk]On Behalf Of Duncan
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:22 AM
> To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [mepbmlist] ReacEnc and InvEnc Question
>
> Hi,
> I've just arrived at an encounter location. So far I've only found
> the entrance to a dark cave and haven't done a 290 InvEnc yet.
>
> Now I know that this is a riddle encounter and I know the correct answer
> (someone came here before).
>
> My question is this. Can I simply do a 285 ReacEnc order with the riddle
> answer
> or do I have to do the 290 InvEnc first ?
>
> cheers,
> Duncan
>
