With MEG now owning the game is there any chance you will start to
use sequential and unique numbers for games?
It would be nice IMO to start over with game 1-1650, 1-2950 and 1-
FA100 and go from there. Every game is sort of different and should
have a unique number. I have found myself talking with someone about
previous game xxx but found out later that we were in different
games.
From a historical aspect I think it would nice to say "you remember
game xxx, that was a great game". Now we need qualifiers like "the
second or third game xxx" or "game xxx from 2002 through 2003" etc.
I agree COMPLETELY. Speaking from the players pool, it is much easier for US to understand one another when the numbers are not re-used.
Jason Mele
···
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Zbaraschuk
To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [mepbmlist] Game numbers
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 05:45:40PM -0000, Steven wrote:
> Clint,
>
> With MEG now owning the game is there any chance you will start to
> use sequential and unique numbers for games?
I would just like to put in my support for this suggestion.
Tony Z
--
Reading bad criticism is, of course, like reading Basque
computer manuals while chewing broken glass, only less useful.
--Kenneth Hite, LHN
With MEG now owning the game is there any chance you will start to
use sequential and unique numbers for games?
Yeh when we get the code changed so that games don't crash when we print them...
It would be nice IMO to start over with game 1-1650, 1-2950 and 1-
FA100 and go from there. Every game is sort of different and should
have a unique number. I have found myself talking with someone about
previous game xxx but found out later that we were in different
games.
From a historical aspect I think it would nice to say "you remember
game xxx, that was a great game". Now we need qualifiers like "the
second or third game xxx" or "game xxx from 2002 through 2003" etc.
