It wasn’t widely supported but it carried the majority who expressed an opinion from the start. I was one of the very few to question it originally but followed it because that was the plan.
And we didn’t all follow it fully so like I said, our main problem was that we never had one plan that we stuck too. Dog wanted you to concentrate your agents, you saw the need to split them and so it went on. I was going to send Gothmog up to Morannon and you asked for him to go West so I did.
But surely you agree that never as a team did we have a clear majority decision on what the overall plan was. When you are a team against a single player like Clint that isn’t going to work in any case.
I don’t think anyone else spoke against the attack plan but yes a few expressed
doubts over it. But not enough oppoisiton to stop the plan due to Dog’s
insistence.
I agree over the 2 plans in the team; and I spoke of this earlier in this thread;
attempting to banrupt EO was plain wrong and wasted our agents stealing
little… Harad’s emissary strategy (again supported by Dog) was plain
stupid and was opposed by not only me… The problem simply was a
couiple of players presumed they knew better and ended up with egg on
their face… I understand you were caught in the middle but then again
some level of hindsight should have been employed.
You’re totally right; against a tight grudge team or 1 player a united team
is needed and thus I will be very wary of what players to have in the team
before attempting another vs 1 grudge game.
I think that’s being employed right now :rolleyes:
For some of the team yes… 
