I don't think that would work. Technically I would
send in orders at 11.59pm on the due date and since
they arrived on the date that the orders are due, they
should be accepted.
Um, no. Give me an hour of the day, give me the time zone, and then
give me the date. I don't ask for much, I don't understand why others
should go "oops" and the rest of us sit and wait. What's with this 11:59
stuff? Do you use a particle beam transfer mechanism? Email is unreliable
at best...I have seen replys to this mailing list come through within 5
minutes, others take hours. Go figure. None of this "My email company
says I sent it at such and such a time..." crap, none of this "Post marked by..."
stuff. The due date is the due date. A concession I would accept is that
someone gets to work, compiles orders, starts punching things into the
computer, and when done, before hitting the big red button, makes one last
check around the place for any late orders. Why not? But an entire extra
day just to count to 25 and send an email out to everyone if you don't get
to 25, and make everyone who found a way to figure it all out in the last
month wait..........please..........
So the GM need to process the orders on the NEXT date.
Since they don't work at midnight, they process the
orders during normal working hours on the next date. I
could then sneak in some orders on that date, and hope
my order are accepted.
Thus it's not sneaking. Because of this, the due date is irrelevant,
the next day is the true due date, and then we wait an extra day
because the company would rather annoy the majority for the sake
of possibly making the minority a little happy..........
>
> Especially for us NAmericans.....we have to have the
> turns submitted, essentially, the night BEFORE the
> "due date" and then get our results some time, 2
> days
> later...or 3 if they go back on their written word
> and
> wait an extra day for the 1 week games.....4 day
> game?
>
> Ah well, bugs and problems etc. Not expecting
> anyone
> to have thought of everything before hand.Whats to thing of ? Harly hasn't changed how it runs
their games, it just that Deft and Harly has different
procedures on when the final cut-off is allowed. Harly
gives people the full 24 hours on the due-date to send
in orders.
No. It gives the due date, and then the 14 or so hours after the
end of the business day on the due date, and then, for however long,
even on the games it said it would not do so, another day.....
Seriously, what is the point of a due date, if the due date is really
sometime, who knows, the NEXT day? I don't get it...I really don't.
Why give your child an 11:00 curfew, if it's okay if they don't come
home until tomorrow, but they're not allowed to stay away for 2 days?
........but they still have a "curfew"......? Is there some bylaw that
the company has to follow but ignore at it's leisure over there....?
It's bloody 11:00 or not. A reasonable time on one day is reasonable.
Why should ANYONE bother sending in orders for Sunday if they "really"
aren't due until Monday, and then won't get processed until Tuesday...
Just
> hoping to see the problems that arise dealt with
> effectively. Especially in this game, I already
> lost
> a turn because of the whole transition and Sunday
> due
> date (I still want an explanation for that...)The transition (like christmas breaks) pushed
everything back a week ???
Yes. My ONE week email game was a Wednesday game. It was pushed back,
not only the week for Xmas, but until Sunday the following week. And then,
interestingly, my email address was incorrect, so I was not sent my orders until
later on the Monday.....long after I had boarded the plane for a country where
internet is rare, and Adobe non-existent.....I eventually had to download the
program in Spanish.........'nough said.........
> conflicting with my out-of country vacation.
> Starting
> to get bitter. Oh yeah, I also overran an army in
> this
> game..........but didn't....what next?What did the other side said to the overrun ?
My pdf said overrun. His pdf said nothing. Clint said maybe my
army "forced" it's way by the smaller army, but maybe GSI would
know........He still has army and characters.
thanks
dinp.s I'm part of the 97% that believes nasa didn't land
on the moon. I know the moon landing is fake since I
pointed my torch at the moon, and I didn't get
anything reflected back from the so-called mirrors
that the astro-nots claim to have left behind.
Of course they didn't land there. Do you honestly know anyone
that thinks they did???
pps well maybe I didn't, but it gives us something
else to argue over.
Agree about to make us feel better about our time zone
disputes!!
ppps And I think God caused the oil spill to get back
at Darwin
God doesn't believe in Darwin, so he wouldn't trash them out of
principle.....or is he really that small minded...???
Regards,
Brad Brunet, wondering how Din voted in the great Aussie
"Dump the Queen" debate.................
ยทยทยท
On Mon, 22 January 2001, Din wrote:
__________________________________________________________
Get your FREE personalized e-mail at http://www.canada.com