I am still scratching my head as to why??? Just go the LCT method.
Here we are talking about sacrificing a character and artiis just to 'track' a dragon and ONLY one dragon.
For a lesser effort, just train a mage, give the mage an artii (which you get to keep) and you can LCT on ANY named dragon. This whole thing seems to have become really complicated for not a difficult task
Jesper,
Good question. Never tried that. Go ahead and try it though I doubt
it would work. You can have two possible outcomes; Either it works
and the dragon gains the artifact OR the artifact is dropped in the
hex. (I think the second option most likely) My rationale is that the
easiest way to prevent artifacts from being transferred to any dragons
would be a simple code fix saying that said dragon already had six
artifacts and couldn't hold any more. By doing that it would prevent
any transfers or transfers by the death of a challenger. Understand?
John
--- Jesper Lyster <jesper@jesperlyster.dk> wrote:
What about challenging the dragon (and losing) that way the dragon
gains the artifacts.... or do they ?
regards
Jesper
>
> John
>
> That was what I believed when it did not work.
>
> Thanks
>
> Thomas
My ICQ number is: 39507873
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
_____________________________________________________________
Your choice of Email, Free email which offers nothing but Ads or Paid email which comes with bells and whistles!, it all can be found @ www.aussiemail.com.au
UHAUHAUAHUAUHAHUAHUAHU
that was exacly what i was wondering about
···
2007/2/1, Adrian Sheridan <morgoth@aussiemail.com.au>:
I am still scratching my head as to why??? Just go the LCT method.
Here we are talking about sacrificing a character and artiis just to
'track' a dragon and ONLY one dragon.
For a lesser effort, just train a mage, give the mage an artii (which you
get to keep) and you can LCT on ANY named dragon. This whole thing seems to
have become really complicated for not a difficult task
Jesper,
Good question. Never tried that. Go ahead and try it though I doubt
it would work. You can have two possible outcomes; Either it works
and the dragon gains the artifact OR the artifact is dropped in the
hex. (I think the second option most likely) My rationale is that the
easiest way to prevent artifacts from being transferred to any dragons
would be a simple code fix saying that said dragon already had six
artifacts and couldn't hold any more. By doing that it would prevent
any transfers or transfers by the death of a challenger. Understand?
> What about challenging the dragon (and losing) that way the dragon
> gains the artifacts.... or do they ?
>
> regards
> Jesper
>
> >
> > John
> >
> > That was what I believed when it did not work.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Thomas
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________
Your choice of Email, Free email which offers nothing but Ads or Paid
email which comes with bells and whistles!, it all can be found @
www.aussiemail.com.au
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This is based on the assumption that Locating a NPC is harder than Locating
a low power artifact. Sure it is expensive to lose a character like that,
but for the FP that can only recruit 2 dragons it can make a lot of
difference (especially since the FP normally have a lot of enemy character
to track).
One thing I was also wondering are dragons wich are recruited by giving
artifacts, do they keep it? Or the artifact is kept where the dragon was
recruited?
UHAUHAUAHUAUHAHUAHUAHU
that was exacly what i was wondering about
2007/2/1, Adrian Sheridan <morgoth@aussiemail.com.au<morgoth%40aussiemail.com.au>
>:
>
> I am still scratching my head as to why??? Just go the LCT method.
> Here we are talking about sacrificing a character and artiis just to
> 'track' a dragon and ONLY one dragon.
> For a lesser effort, just train a mage, give the mage an artii (which
you
> get to keep) and you can LCT on ANY named dragon. This whole thing seems
to
> have become really complicated for not a difficult task
>
> Adrian
>
> — John_Seals@yahoo.com <John_Seals%40yahoo.com> <John_Seals% 40yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From: John Seals <John_Seals@yahoo.com <John_Seals%40yahoo.com><John_Seals% 40yahoo.com>>
> To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com <mepbmlist%40yahoogroups.com><mepbmlist%40yahoog roups.com>
> Subject: Re: [mepbmlist] Re: Locating Dragon (#430)
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:57:00 -0800 (PST)
>
> Jesper,
> Good question. Never tried that. Go ahead and try it though I doubt
> it would work. You can have two possible outcomes; Either it works
> and the dragon gains the artifact OR the artifact is dropped in the
> hex. (I think the second option most likely) My rationale is that the
> easiest way to prevent artifacts from being transferred to any dragons
> would be a simple code fix saying that said dragon already had six
> artifacts and couldn't hold any more. By doing that it would prevent
> any transfers or transfers by the death of a challenger. Understand?
>
> John
>
> — Jesper Lyster <jesper@jesperlyster.dk <jesper%40jesperlyster.dk><jesper%40jesperlys
ter.dk>>
> wrote:
>
> > What about challenging the dragon (and losing) that way the dragon
> > gains the artifacts… or do they ?
> >
> > regards
> > Jesper
> >
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > That was what I believed when it did not work.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> My ICQ number is: 39507873
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
> in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Your choice of Email, Free email which offers nothing but Ads or Paid
> email which comes with bells and whistles!, it all can be found @
> www.aussiemail.com.au
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
