Thanks Kevin - as far as I am concerned each player plays for their own goals in the game - some more interested in their own posiitons, some like playing teams etc. Each to their own - I think that ME can accomodate both. I see Kim's article as just something that helps puts things in perspective and players are welcome to use it as they see fit.
Clint
···
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Bond <Bond@heatingsystems.freeserve.co.uk>
To: mepbmlist@onelist.com <mepbmlist@onelist.com>
Date: 09 December 1999 22:12
Subject: [mepbmlist] mepbmlist re Kim's article
Greeting's
I hope the powers to be at Harlequin knock Kim's idea on the head asap as I beleive this will only see the ego hunters playing the glory positons for themselves and the real team players those that purposley play the weaker positions as a challenge and those neutrals that join a losing side to acheive game balance, these are the real players of M.E. Remember folks that at the end of the day this is a team game and individual winners is a side line and quite often the more selfish players win. BAD IDEA, but if you do follow Kim's idea up then take into account Kevin O'K's suggestion, this made a lot more sense.
Best Regards
Kevin Bond
Tel :01454 883955
Mobile :0961 844986
EMail :Bond@HeatingSystems.Freeserve.Co.Uk