mepbmlist re Kim's article

Greeting's

I hope the powers to be at Harlequin knock Kim's idea on the head asap as I
beleive this will only see the ego hunters playing the glory positons for
themselves and the real team players those that purposley play the weaker
positions as a challenge and those neutrals that join a losing side to acheive
game balance, these are the real players of M.E. Remember folks that at the end
of the day this is a team game and individual winners is a side line and quite
often the more selfish players win. BAD IDEA, but if you do follow Kim's idea up
then take into account Kevin O'K's suggestion, this made a lot more sense.

I agree with the sentiment entirely, but doubt it would have much effect
on the game. But then, I'm thinking of having another go at Dragon Lord
or maybe Northman, as I'm finding Noldo very dull and WK great fun.

Would prefer victory points to be based on enemy troops and characters
killed, pops captured, change in tax base... that sort of thing. I
think this would liven things up a bit. Current VPs promote sitting
back, building up and saving.

Best Regards
Kevin Bond
Tel :01454 883955
Mobile :0961 844986

EMail :Bond@HeatingSystems.Freeserve.Co.Uk

Martin

ยทยทยท

In message <007f01bf4292$2f733100$7fb7883e@default>, Kevin Bond <Bond@heatingsystems.freeserve.co.uk> writes