Hi,
Wow! I believe my game 77 GMs and friends team (including 5 players in their
first game) could defeat the best ME players in the world if we had 4
neutrals.
Er, Sam ... We could defeat them anyway - come on Mr. Team Captain Sir, don't do us down!
I don't understand how the DS could deal with North Gondor, South Gondor,
Harad and the Corsairs all being in the Ithil Pass on turn 5 with about
20,000 troops.
I agree - in this scenario the DS would lose in a remarkably short time. DS agent power
would be helpless against the sheer weight of military might that could be pushed through
the Ithil pass. Moreover, the scale of DS losses would be immense before they had the chance
to recruit any dragons.
Aside from anything else, I remain unconvinced, big time that (given a decent team set-upon
on both sides) the DS have much of an innate advantage anyway. I know this is possibly
contoversial, but I would be against any further changes that beefed up the DS just on the
basis of accumulated figures from the past - the situation NOW seems rather different.
Dividing up the neutrals in a different way is certainly interesting, but I wonder if the
answer might be to be even more creative - depending on how much leeway there is in the
set-up proceedure. I like the idea of giving Rhudaur a MT/t in the Misty Mountains - but one
could also play around with the other Neutral positions. For instance giving Dunland a
back-up MT if they are to be DS - assuming they are to be in play at all.
Without time to go into all the possibilities myself at present, I would suggest that the
best way forward for anyone seeking a fresh experience in a grudge game would be to look at
a more radical set-up.
Colin.