In a message dated 6/1/01 7:47:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ditletang@canada.com writes:
<< Either you interjected into the middle of a conversation that you
hadn't really been following (always productive....), or you are
calling the person who started this a LIAR.
Which is it?
bb for "Fair and Reasonable Discussions Everywhere"
>>
Or, he may have assumed, perhaps rightly or perhaps wrongly, that a ScoHex
will always produce the same result (in the same game). I think this
discourteous response violated the rules of gentlemanly behaviour under which
the bulletin board is supposed to operate, and calls for, at a minimum, a
warning from the administrator.
Ed
In a message dated 6/1/01 7:47:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ditletang@canada.com writes:
<< Either you interjected into the middle of a conversation that you
hadn't really been following (always productive....), or you are
calling the person who started this a LIAR.
Which is it?
bb for "Fair and Reasonable Discussions Everywhere"
>>
Or, he may have assumed, perhaps rightly or perhaps wrongly, that a ScoHex
will always produce the same result (in the same game). I think this
discourteous response violated the rules of gentlemanly behaviour under
which
the bulletin board is supposed to operate, and calls for, at a minimum, a
warning from the administrator.
Ed
Guys, I did not want snotty talk over my initial post.
To rephrase the question I asked several days ago.
If a camp with a new name is posted on the site of the ruins of a
detroyed pop center, Does the computer generate new production totals
or is production fixed ?
So far here are the 2 answers I got.
When the nation who had owned the pop center previously replace the
pop center, the production was the same as before it was destroyed.
If a scout hex is done on the same hex repeatedly, the production
levels are the same.
This would lead me to believe that production was fixed at game start.
PERIOD
The former is more of the answer I was looking for. It just seemed
strange that in 2 different games Lag-Scarra (The Ice King camp 3022
in the woods) would have substandard production when compare to other
setups I have seen. In both cases my production was about 650 food and
150 timber after reposting. I have seen 1000+foods and 500 timber
producers on IK setups.
Maybe this question should be for Clint. Was my renamed posted camp,
a)generated by the program a the moment it was posted ?
b)was Lag Scarra just a poor producer in both games ?
c)was it a bug ?
Guys, I did not want snotty talk over my initial post.
To rephrase the question I asked several days ago.
If a camp with a new name is posted on the site of the ruins of a
detroyed pop center, Does the computer generate new production totals
or is production fixed ?
So far here are the 2 answers I got.
When the nation who had owned the pop center previously replace the
pop center, the production was the same as before it was destroyed.
If a scout hex is done on the same hex repeatedly, the production
levels are the same.
This would lead me to believe that production was fixed at game start.
PERIOD
The former is more of the answer I was looking for. It just seemed
strange that in 2 different games Lag-Scarra (The Ice King camp 3022
in the woods) would have substandard production when compare to other
setups I have seen. In both cases my production was about 650 food and
150 timber after reposting. I have seen 1000+foods and 500 timber
producers on IK setups.
Maybe this question should be for Clint. Was my renamed posted camp,
a)generated by the program a the moment it was posted ?
b)was Lag Scarra just a poor producer in both games ?
c)was it a bug ?
Generally I find it calms things down if you