My source for the 330,000 trucks was the West Point Military History
Series, The Second World War, Europe and the Mediterranean which was
(if not still is)used as a basic military history text for trainee
officers at West Point. They specifically state that the bulk of the
trucks arrived 1943 and on. Every other, serious, source I have read
sees the US Lend/Lease as a useful not determining factor in Russias
victory.
The victory at Stalingrad (Late 42) was a consequence of a limited
pincer movement as opposed to a deep penetration for which trucks
were most useful. Every time the Russians tried it they got cut off
and destroyed so they tended to concentrate their force for a
breakthrough and then grind forward in overwhelming numbers without
exposing their flanks. Of course the trucks were useful for supply
and keeping up pursuit but the Russians had some anyway and were not
vital for their tactical doctrine.
Kursk was a defense in depth (Breaking into Mordor through the
Morrannon) rather than a battle of manouvere (Cavalry on the plains),
so the trucks were pretty irrelevant.
It shows how ingrained a concept can get with ardent defenders
of 'Blighty' prepared to concede the US credit where not due. Too
much Hollywood sapping yer brains lads! Whilst not certain, Britain,
Russia and allies would have defeated Nazi Germany without the
entrance of the USA into the war. Credit where credit is due. Cold
War yes, WWII Europe no.
The West Point series of books is an excellent introduction to
Military History and concepts. Generally well written and very
accessible for the layman. If they are still available then I
strongly reccommend them. Raise the level of debate.
Cheers
Chris Courtiour