That's correct, 'though it's important to say that
that was not the point
of the design - it was to "correct" some things
which were less true to the
military positions as described or suggested in "The
Lord of the
Rings." The DS forces are poised to surge out of
Mordor with awesome
force, and the FP, though in a far from hopeless
situation, start
definitely on the back foot.
LGT, care to take us on again? This time you get DS,
we get FP?
Anyone?
···
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
I'd love to, and fully endorse the remark that WotR is the best scenario
yet. Unfortunately however, I'm no longer part of a regular "grudge"
team. If there's another 9 wanderers out there who want to give you a
thrashing, I'll join up. (Or 4 for that matter if we're playing 2 nations
each.)
[]
Laurence G.Tilley
http://www.lgtilley.freeserve.co.uk
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
···
At 14:41 23/03/2005, Darrell Shimel wrote:
> That's correct, 'though it's important to say that
> that was not the point
> of the design - it was to "correct" some things
> which were less true to the
> military positions as described or suggested in "The
> Lord of the
> Rings." The DS forces are poised to surge out of
> Mordor with awesome
> force, and the FP, though in a far from hopeless
> situation, start
> definitely on the back foot.
LGT, care to take us on again? This time you get DS,
we get FP?
