Note the new pairings and changes are not designed by us. At the request of the players we changed it. Personally I slightly prefer the older groupings (but as I’m not playing it’s not pertinent):
FP: 1/4 Woodmen/Arthedain, 2/8 Northmen/Dwarves (4017 Fort), 3/7 Eothraim/South Gondor, 5/9 Cardolan/Sindar, 6/23 North Gondor/Dunlendings, 10/22 Noldo/Harad
DS: 11/20 Witch King/Dark Lieutenants, 12/21 Dragon Lord/Corsairs, 13/15 Dog Lord/Blind Sorcerer, 14/24 Cloud Lord/Rhudaur (CL town @3428 goes to village, CL town @3629 goes to MT, 1910 Fort), 16/19 Ice King/Long Rider, 17/18 Quiet Avenger/Fire King
New version: DS: WK/DkL (1804 city), Rhu/LR (1910 city/castle; 1908 fort; 2208 MT/fort), FK/CL, Cor/DrgL, IK/QA, DogL/BS
FP: NG/Duns, Northmen/DW (4217 fort), Arth/Wood, Noldo/Harad, Sinda/Card, SG/EO
I’m happy to have us support either. I can’t really feedback about the games as they are presently running. What we’re intending to do this time is run a 1wk game - I’ll go with the new format for nations (like I said I’m pretty easy about either) and I’ll collate that info later today to see who’s up for playing (got around 4 positions left)
From before though (mostly as a player so feel free to disagree/agree): I don’t see any need to improve the FPs - if any I’d do the NM/Dwarf combo. Noldo has a massive character strength to make up for the deficit in the Harad (and from a military perspective the Cor/Har is winnable by either side in my experience).
Clint