I am in this same category. I seldom talk due to everything being overkilled by the time I read it, or it is not that big of an issue, since I will simply adjust my play to whatever is figured out. I am just playing for the interaction with others and maybe trying out some aspect I haven't done before.
Randy
···
From: "Aaruman" <aaruman@orions.net>
Reply-To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
To: <mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [mepbmlist] Re: PRS Newsletter Forum Group
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:26:15 -0500I agree. Some people are probably not "chatty" because there are a few people who are
incredibly "chatty". Not that this is bad, but most subjects are usually beat to death
(mainly by the same few "chatty" people) within a short period of time, and many times
there is no point in adding to it. I also agree that some people probably would rather
not post just to get shouted down by the more vocal of the "chatty" people.And BTW, I like Bree the way it is, personally. (And yes, I did vote.)
Mike
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sm_069@yahoo.com [mailto:sm_069@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:28 AM
>To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [mepbmlist] Re: PRS Newsletter Forum Group
>
>There is allot of discussion about "chatty" players and those who do
>not chat. Well, I for one, don't post allot due to the fact that
>most of the time the subjects are hashed about so much that I don't
>even have the time or the patience to read them all. Talk about
>beating a dead dog. Then, when someone does post a opinion, some of
>the more "chatty" players trash that person like he's (or she's) an
>idiot for even thinking about going against their ideas.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp