Are there plans to place all rankings on the PRS system not just 1-50? I see there are 'page 2’s on the web site but nothing on them.
Thanks,
Paul Young
Feedback welcome.
Clint
Ok I just received the ME Games email on the PRS and it seems the second pages have not been implemented yet.
Paul
Well, yesterday, when the just got it up, they had like, 14 pages for each with every single player on file that they could compute up there. They’ve made a few web page tweeks since then, but they certainly have the information…what’s up?
As for Feedback:
Nazgul Rating - you’ll have to create some sort of minimum game cut off for this. All those people with 90ish, 80ish, etc Win%'s will never get on this list because you have 176 people who’ve played and won 1 game…
No Rhudaur information? Come on! I was hoping to see myself on at least 1 VP based list!
Brad Brunet
Ta Brad - anything else? I’ll fix the Rhudaur bits and some of the typos. As for Nazgul I’ll look into implementing a cut off of say 5 games before you can get posted there.
Would that sort it?
As for number of pages - how many should we do?
Nobodies commented on the 1650 Noldo 11k VPs yet… 
(Thought we had fixed that one as well!) Yum doncha just love going live.
Clint
I’d like to see what games I received my votes in. That might not be posted, but I’d like to know which games I did particularly well in.
jason
Clint, the Sinda no 1 Istari VP in 1650 of 7500 looks a bit suspicious?
Paul
Sure relieved this PRS is not taking up to many GM manhours.
Originally posted by 88 Noldo
Sure relieved this PRS is not taking up to many GM manhours.
Between your conspiracy theories about Clint secretly owning the source code and your constant bitching about any changes Clint makes to the game, you seem to derive more fun from whining than you do from actually playing.
If the PRS prevents me from ever being on your team, I’ll certainly consider it a success.
actually the nazgul rating could be decided by a simple algebraic formula…assuming you have a 50% chance of winning each time then determining those who have beaten the odds by the greatest amount…that would prevent the rating from being bad mearly because you took the greater amount of risk of losing by playing more games…ummm…some math major help me out here lol