Nope, don't have one(a veto that is) and if I did it wouldn't be
'imperious'. Again I find myself with the same reasons a lot of us don't
bother with these groups. I won't go into that any further as I'm not
prepared, nor is it proper, to name names but will say that if I can be
considered to be 'imperious' does that mean some of you think you are
deified?
Such adjectives, imperious, pompous, selfish and low. Such a noble
combination, perhaps there's more of the aristocrat in me than I thought!
So, I forgot to give a reason. A simple, "And your reason for suggesting we
leave this to those who want ratings?" would have been more appropriate than
your pointed rant. Incidentally, my answer would have been, "Is it fair to
influence something that I believe will have no bearing on my play? In
answer to another question regarding super-stats searching teams, players
would soon recognise them and would, I would have thought, ask to be placed
in a game away from those players. In a manner of speaking the word would be
out on them." I think for the future it would be considerate of you to
remember that people are prone to mistakes. Perhaps asking for clarification
of a question, comment or opinion before slating a fellow player or players,
which I had no intention of doing, would be more appropriate and effective.
I suppose I do lurk so you've got me there. I've played this game since very
early on with GAD and have amassed quite a bit of data as well as formulae
on random movement patters. I have no intention of giving that little lot up
so, lurk, sneak and hoard. You sure it'd not be better to call me a Hobbit
or Dwarf? Then again you weren't looking to compliment me were you? Those
that lurk do so for a reason. Wonder why they don't take part? Perhaps the
opinions of those who think they are always right(Imperious?) have something
to do with it?
Yes folks post away freely. Strange that LGT needed to say that as I assume
you all knew you could anyway.
Alan J.