Rulebook

Amen, Brother Kev!

···

From: Kevin <kevin@bobbins71.freeserve.co.uk>
Reply-To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
To: mepbmlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mepbmlist] Rulebook
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:40:17 +0100

> We're looking to update the rulebook. We want to turn it from a rules
>manual into a guide for new players, teaching them how to use specific
> orders, and also walking through the Resultsheets and other information we
> It will also have a lot for experienced players with
> explanations and hints of many tactical aspects of the game.

Oh dear! What an awful idea.

I assume you are talking about a new "rulebook" as well as the one we've
got at the moment?

A "How to" guide is a waste of time IMO. That's what a players team-mates
are for.

I think the current rulebooks are excellent. They don't need changing.
Can't you just leave them as they are? If you want to publish some
information on your website or something, go right ahead? Just because you
have lots of free time at the moment Clint, please don't go tinkering with
everything!

Kev

P.S - I for one, don't agree with player ratings either. I don't strongly
disagree like Darrell, but if I had to make a choice, I'd say it was a bad
thing. The poll on the Bobbins Website has been changed btw for anyone who
wants to vote on this issue? Not very scientific I know, but it'll still
be interesting to see the results.

_________________________________________________________________
Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp

>I assume you are talking about a new "rulebook" as well as the one we've
>got at the moment?

** To replace it. Also to save players money - instead of having to buy 2/3 books you need just the one would be my hope. Not sure if that is viable yet or not though. These are early days and I am just feeling around.

>A "How to" guide is a waste of time IMO. That's what a players team-mates
>are for.

*** Yes if you have such a group that are helpful. If not you flounder and drop at least 50% of the time.

>I think the current rulebooks are excellent. They don't need changing.

*** I don't agree for the reasons given above and the emails we get each week asking for clarification about X or Y. Actually everyone so far who has replied to this on Rulebooks has queried me about some aspect of the game or not even quite recently... :slight_smile:

>Can't you just leave them as they are? If you want to publish some
>information on your website or something, go right ahead? Just because you
>have lots of free time at the moment Clint, please don't go tinkering with
>everything!

** I wish I had lots of free-time. :slight_smile:

Clint