Worst FA set-up ever

Okay having seen the odd FA set-up now, we had a little discussion in the
office, (yes the hours do fly), about the Worst FA set-up. The aim is to
go bankrupt on turn 1.

Harbours are nice and cheap so we'll have a coastal set of camps with every
place with a harbour, obviously spending those extra points on
fotifications (towers everywhere - not sure if Port or high level
fortifications is best here).

Then we buy warships using the 20k and obviously the biggest army that you
can. Character-wise which is best single classed big lads or multi-classed
no doubt we can go into that tomorrow. (Useless abilities would be cool as
well but heh that might be going too far).

Clint

If we're trying to go bankrupt on turn 1, we want our expenses
to be as high as possible, so we go for the cheap multi-class
characters --as many skill points as we can manage!

Tony Z

ยทยทยท

On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 09:45:15PM -0500, SAS/ALLSORTS wrote:

Okay having seen the odd FA set-up now, we had a little discussion in the
office, (yes the hours do fly), about the Worst FA set-up. The aim is to
go bankrupt on turn 1.

Harbours are nice and cheap so we'll have a coastal set of camps with every
place with a harbour, obviously spending those extra points on
fotifications (towers everywhere - not sure if Port or high level
fortifications is best here).

Then we buy warships using the 20k and obviously the biggest army that you
can. Character-wise which is best single classed big lads or multi-classed
no doubt we can go into that tomorrow. (Useless abilities would be cool as
well but heh that might be going too far).

--
"The King with half the East at heel is marched from lands of morning;
His fighters drink the rivers up, their shafts benight the air,
And he that stays will die for naught, and home there's no returning."
The Spartans on the sea-wet rock sat down and combed their hair.--A.E. Housman