Originally posted by RKFloyd
Are you now attempting to re-ingratiate yourself with the community or have you simply run out of things to say?
Never, either.
I play the way I play, and I say what I think. If that takes me out of favor, too freakin’ bad. I’ll never “suck up” or shut up.
Since no one brought up PRS, I felt no obligation to mention it. Now that someone has, I will.
Tell me. If the PRS is good for the game, how can playing for a good score be bad for the game? How can wanting to be the best ranked player I can be, put me in disfavor, unless of course, it is a SUCKY system that rewards SUCKY play?
I’m going to get 2000 VPs for this game, unless the DS and/or FP launch a character attack in the end game. Back in the bad old days of GSI, when the VPs had meaning (like they again do now) I had to do many of those. They were no fun.
Regardless of whether you attack me or not, I’ve show that playing in a game with someone that is trying to get MAX VPs, is no fun. Since PRS encourages people to play for Max VPs, it is bad for the game.
You anger and name calling have gone a very long way to proving my point. Thanks. The FP silence sure didn’t help me. Rat bastards, keeping thier mouths shut…
So, if I to believe half of what I hear, the WK is burning Ranger pops, QA and Corsairs are slicing and dicing SG, while the NG recovers from an early ass kicking, while Khand is rolling the Northmen, the DrgLrd sits secure in Mirkwood, Dog threatens to overrun Rohan and WW is ignoring everyone while looking for the one ring.
Wow, some balance could sure be brought to the game if it weren’t for PRS and the way it encourages neutrals to sit on the fence for as long as possible, then jump onto the winning side at the last minute.
Guess I’ll be jumping to the DS real soon. I better start recruiting and selling to get the army and gold scores up.